Now lets apply some of the key concepts of earlier posts. In practical terms, if the imperfect timber we are using has two relatively square surfaces it is easier to imagine that the perfect timber inside begins on these two surfaces(these are the reference faces) and the remaining perfect faces lie within the remaining imperfect timber. If we align the reference faces of the timber with the reference planes of the building then the important dimensions and functions of the building/structure will be "fixed".
Once the reference planes are identified it should be fairly simple to identify them on the timber right? You can just pick any face to be the top reference face right? Well No. Picking the correct surface will make laying out joinery simpler, will make the frame stronger, and ensure that the final frame dimensions match the drawing. The essential concept here is to properly match the timber’s natural characteristics (both strength and aesthetic traits) to the requirements previously identified. Timbers, all wood really, have natural strength characteristics that are derived from their growing conditions and how the timber was sawn out of the log.
Part three of Introduction to Square Rule joinery series Back to the Beginning Let’s go back the original issue of what to do with timbers that vary in size and regularity, i.e. dealing with imperfect timbers; a question you might have considered was why not just use "perfect timbers" whose dimensions are known. Some modern timber framers do and these timbers are known as S4S, but the availability and practicality of acquiring these timbers is often cost prohibitive and/or impossible. The difference in material costs between rough sawn and S4S timber could easily be a factor of 4 or more. […]
Part two of Introduction to Square Rule joinery series
Before getting to the essence of square rule joinery, it is helpful to outline some key concepts and definitions that will help understanding the concept of square rule joinery.
Understanding square rule joinery is a multi-step process that begins with understanding the goal, the obstacles to reaching that goal, the concept that overcomes these obstacles, and finally the implementation that makes the concept a reality. You can’t simply begin cutting joinery without first knowing how and perhaps more importantly why the steps are important. This series is meant as an overview to help conceptualize the process and you may find that going through the steps multiple times sheds even more light on what is a simple but powerful concept.
The second in a series of articles exploring some common types of timber frame configurations. Considered by many the common rafter and long plate system is consider by many to be the traditional style of American timber framing. Roof joinery is a little more involved than with the principal rafter and common purlin system. Assembled and raised as wall-lines this configuration lends itself to a hand raising.
[glossary_exclude] [/glossary_exclude] The principal rafter and common purlin system The first in a series of articles exploring some common types of timber frame configurations. Considered a modern style of timber framing, the principal rafter and common purlin system has several advantages that beginner timber framers will appreciate. The joinery is, on a whole, simpler than in a common rafter system.
What is the difference Very often the terms are used interchangeably but not necessarily correctly. The difference is very slight, and essentially boils down to specificity. Post-and-Beam construction refers to all types of construction where a limited number of posts(vertical members) support beams (horizontal members); as opposed to stud construction where repetitive vertical members are used (Platform framing is in common use today, but balloon framing would also fall under the category of stud construction). Post-and-beam would include both heavy timber and lighter framing, pole-buildings are technically post-and-beam. But